Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts
Showing posts with label politics. Show all posts

Tuesday, March 12, 2013

This Is Why I Should Probably Never Meet A Movie Celebrity . . .


Remember that banquet I got to go to the other night??? I got the opportunity to shake hands with our MP, Brian Jean {two degrees of separation between me and the prime minister!!!}. Anyways, I'm pretty sure I did not make any sense in our interaction, and I couldn't shut up. But he was very pleasant and told me not to be nervous to introduce myself in the future. Haha, however, now we know that I'm all talk and no confidence :P

Here's another picture of me and the bestie from that night.


Happy Tuesday!


Monday, April 23, 2012

No. 256 - Election Day & OUAT


Just a reminder that today is Alberta's Election Day.
I hope you get the opportunity to make it to the polls.



It's been awhile since my favourite TV show Once Upon A Time has aired a new episode, and I really did not care for last night's episode. Therefore, that makes Rumplestiltskin-centred-episodes 0-2. Here are my thoughts on "The Return".
  • Best Moment: I've said it before, but the interactions between August W. Booth and Henry are my absolute favourite part about both of their characters. Henry needs someone to believe in him just as much as August W. Booth does.
  • Worst Moment: Well, pretty much this episode. It really did not answer any questions except for the fact that August W. Booth is in fact NOT Rumplestiltskin's son. However about 10 minutes into the episode, I had already figured that out. It would have been too easy. However, we still do not know who August W. Booth really is. All we know is that he is sick and needs magic.
  • Crossover Moment: I like the callback to the digging/burying in the woods by Mr. Gold from several episodes ago.
  • Sweet Moment: I liked when David visited Katherine in the hospital.
  • Evil Moment: Regina setting Sydney up to take the fall for Katherine's disappearance. 
  • Cliffhanger: Emma is fighting for custody!
  • Next Episode: Pinocchio. 



Thursday, April 12, 2012

No. 245 - Decision Alberta


As many of you who are friends with me on Facebook know, I attended the Provincial Candidate Debate last night for the upcoming Alberta election on April 23rd. One of my values is a sense of belonging and responsibility for the province I live in, and if that means being involved and informed in politics, so be it. 

I recognize that it is difficult for people, especially my age, to be involved in politics due to youth alienation. Political parties are just not geared towards youth, and on a bigger note, it's hard for us to feel a sense of ownership for our province (or country). I believe that lack of ownership is the reason for low voter turnout especially in the younger demographic. I'm not writing this to guilt anyone into voting, but my two reasons for making it to the polls are as follows: 1) I am living in a free country, and due to my thankfulness of that, I am going to vote in our democracy, even if the system is flawed; and 2) I am a woman with the eligibility to vote; this was not always the case and for the many who fought for this right, I am thankful.

Now to make things easier, here are the candidates and little bit about what they had to say.

Conklin Riding
To be honest, this first debate was somewhat of a joke. There were three candidates present, but the whole thing felt very uncomfortable, due to the lack of knowledge of some of the candidates.
  • Wildrose - Doug Faulkner. The very first thing he said in his introduction was, "It's time", which is one of the Wildrose's slogans. However, the unfortunate part was that the rest of his speeches were chalked full of similar slogans and cliche phrases. I didn't actually hear a lot of practical plans or future decisions. Some of his stories felt inappropriate; however, his view of the pipelines and lack of physicians in Fort McMurray was promising.
  • NDP - Paul Pomerleau. This was an unfortunate representation. This candidate was not relevant and did not possess the adequate knowledge to represent Fort McMurray. I tuned out shortly after he began talking, because he was extremely uninformed. One interesting thing of note was his platform on the pipelines - he wasn't in favour of them being built.
  • PC - Donald Scott. This candidate addressed a lot of healthcare concerns, which I appreciated. He referenced a lot of recent reports and was in favour of the pipelines. He also promoted making Keyano College a degree university.


Wood Buffalo Riding
This was the debate to see if you were to choose one. Although there were only two candidates present (pictured above), they both knew their information and were relevant to Fort McMurray.
  • PC - Mike Allen. He began by saying that the PC was a tried & true party for Alberta. He stated that their focus was health, education, and families. He wanted to look at the national immigration system in order to fix health care worker accreditation. He fully supported both pipelines and promised to put the dollars back on the health care frontlines. His delivery and speeches were very calm and polished.
  • Wildrose - Guy Boutilier. He began by saying this his party represents voters. Their slogan is, "Balance the books & save for the future". He talked a lot about listening to doctors & nurses and knocking down the provincial barriers for immigration relocation. He fully supported the pipeline. His delivery and speeches were very passionate and engaging.

There you have it. I think the funniest question from the night is when an audience member asked what the Wood Buffalo candidates thought about each other. Either way, I hope this information will help you, and I'll see you April 23rd!


Wednesday, March 21, 2012

No. 223 - Politics


Right now, I am taking Political Science as a mandatory elective (although I don't know why they call it an elective when it's mandatory). Anyways, I am having a bit of a difficult time with it. I guess when I started the course, I figured it would be a lot about Canada, history, facts, dates, people, and systems. It is all that, but this class should have been called Political Philosophy not Political Science.

The content is very much about controversial areas such as freedom, equality, rights, morals, values, etc. This is interesting except that I am finding it very difficult to know what it expected of me in the course. When I write the answer to a midterm, I lose marks because I am not thinking outside of the box even though all the right answers are there on the page. 

Another thing that I am finding frustrating is the picture of negativity painted over Canadian politics. Now, I will be the first to admit the system is flawed. However, at the beginning of the semester, our instructor told us that the purpose of this course is so that we could be better involved and care more. However, I am finding the lack of hopefulness and right course of action disheartening. Maybe I am asking too much? I am just so thankful to live in Canada, and as far as political systems and economies go, I thought we had it pretty good.

Either way, tonight is the second midterm, so we'll see how that goes . . .


Monday, August 22, 2011

No. 13 - Jack Layton


In the modified words of another:
"I did not always agree with his viewpoints, but I admired his ambition."

Rest In Peace.